Reshaping the World Order

Russia's actions in Ukraine are far less telling than the reaction of Western despots.

The demands — finally

Well, now we have it. After twelve days of assault on Ukraine (it's hardly a war) the Russians have stated their demands – and they are exactly as we expected and have suggested before. They want the Crimea to be permanently ceded to Russia, the Russian-speaking eastern republics of Donetsk and Luhansk to be independent, recognised by Ukraine and the rewriting of the Ukrainian constitution as a neutral state which could never, thereby, join NATO. That, basically, is it.

Let's look at those one-by-one. The Crimean demand is a rubber-stamp. The region has de facto been occupied by Russia for eight years and they are going nowhere. The second, the independence of the breakaway republics, is a fait accompli; Russia has recognised them and pledged to defend them, should the Ukrainian government attempt to take them back. Again, this is a rubber-stamp, simply making legal what main force has already established.

The important one is the third: that Ukraine become a neutral nation in perpetuity and therefore could not join NATO. Understanding that requires some subtlety.

For a moment, imagine how the USA would react were Russia to place intermediate-range nuclear weapons in, say Venezuela. Well, actually, we don't need to imagine, we can just refer to history. In 1962 the then President, Democrat John F Kennedy, risked global nuclear war when the USSR placed nuclear missiles on Cuba, despite the fact that the USA had already placed nuclear weapons in Turkey. Double standard much? We know how the USA would react – as it always does, with violence.

In fact, ever since the end of World War Two, the US establishment has been the real global warmonger. In repeated attempts to divert attention from its establishment's grotesque failures at home, it has spread death, destruction and calumny across the globe.

The USA simply refuses to accept that the rest of the world does not want its version of society and in these last few years we have begun to see why – the USA is a rotting corpse. The issues surrounding the War of 1860 were never resolved and they have once again come back to pollute the planet, in 'wokeism' and 'Critical Race Theory' – for which read 'anti-white racism'.

USican ‘democracy’

Nobody wants Usican 'democracy' because everybody else realises that all the USA really wants is to be able to exploit other nations and peoples. It wants to be free to suck their wealth out and 'redistribute' it to Usican oligarchs, through their vast companies like Amazon, Google and Facebook, to name but three. And, as it never hesitates to show, it is prepared to destroy entire nations to the end of enslaving their peoples to its world order.

'We bring you the dream of democracy (Usican-style)' its envoys and media tell us – conveniently omitting the corollary that always comes with Usican largesse --.'but if you refuse you may have the nightmare of Armageddon instead. Our weapons industry, rather than our technical ones, will profit, but it's all the same to us.' You ask anyone in Iraq or Libya what they think of Usican 'democracy'.

For decades now, the USA has used its proxies, controlled and funded by the CIA, to foment civil unrest in any country that dared to recognise Usica for what it is – the global enemy, not the global ally. The CIA was behind the putsch that saw Zelensky put in power and CIA money has been behind the persecution of Russian-speaking ethnic minorities in Ukraine ever since. They knew all along that there would come a day when Putin would resist but in their insufferable entitlement believed that he would fail. I'm not so sure about that.

So to the point: Crimea has long gone, forget closing that stable door. The breakaway republics are now independent, protected by the Russian military, only one tenth of which has been deployed to give Ukraine a drubbing it will not forget. In the fullness of time, perhaps a year or so, those republics will apply for membership of the Russian Federation, a request which will also be rubber-stamped.

The issue that remains is Ukrainian membership of NATO, something that the USican Establishment, now represented by a figurehead puppet in FJoe Biden, passionately desires. The question is, are we prepared to allow USica to drag us into a European war – possibly a global conflict – because of it?

For the sake of Europe, the world, and our children, it's time to tell Usica that it's no longer welcome; to bugger off and take its ideas with it.

The Saviour of the Rats.

The conflict in Ukraine has served the Western Establishment wonderfully well, don't you think? Through it, the most despotic, corrupt and incompetent dictators the West has seen in over seventy years, can cast a smokescreen over their manifest treachery. It could hardly have worked out better for the globalists.

FJoe Biden, Manny Mac Macron, Bojo Johnson, wee teacher's pet Trudy, whatever women – male or female – are running the EU and so many more, all look to this crisis to divert attention from what they did. These are people who crimes should have them locked up at best and in other days, face the guillotine or a firing squad. I'm not sure that change was 'progress'. It is helpful for politicians to be terrified of the populations they would oppress, don't you think?

Who gave them the right to put their entire populations under house arrest? Who gave the the right to turn civilian police forces into paramilitary goon squads? Who gave them the right to force the citizenry to accept being injected with unproven 'vaccines' against a disease that actually kills fewer than the common cold? In the UK in 2021, you had more chance of dying from dementia, heart disease or bronchitis than Covid – which actually accounted for only 5.4% of deaths. (Office of National Statistics) Did we see nationwide hysteria over dementia? No, we didn't.

It is impossible now, not to ask oneself whether this was all planned. Did the globalist New World Order see that the tide was turning and decide to take drastic action?

NWO – 'Shit, it looks like populism and nationalism are winning – damn that Donald Trump. What can we do?'

WHO – 'We could manufacture a pandemic for you.'

NWO – 'Oh good, then we could turn our police forces into paramilitary goon squads, ruin people's lives, destroy their businesses and economies! Great! Then maybe they'll see sense and do things our way. And we'll see to it you get lucrative sinecures on the boards of some nice big pharmaceutical companies.'

WHO – 'Thank you so much, just give us time to buy up stock in those companies, please. And we daresay you'll be needing weapons to use against your populations, so we'll invest in those too.'

You're quite sure it didn't happen like that?

The Party of Slavery

I've been thinking about slavery for a while and of course, reading a lot. You see, in the West today, you'd be forgiven for thinking that slavery was something uniquely perpetrated on black people by white ones. But that's a blatant lie. Throughout history there have been slaves and most of them were not black.

The Mesopotamians had slaves – and they were not black. The Greeks had slaves and indeed the Spartans enslaved an entire nation as workers, the Helots. They weren't black. The Romans had slaves. Most of whom were not black, though I am sure some busybody will find a reference to one. The Turks enslaved people from all over Europe and Asia, with a taste for Circassian boys (from modern southern Russia), who were particularly fair and had blue eyes. Definitely Not Black. They were the most popular sex slaves in the Ottoman Empire.

Even the blacks who genuinely were enslaved were mainly so by other blacks, slavery being endemic across sub-Saharan Africa – as it still is. At least twenty-three million people today are held as slaves, almost none of them by whites – and that is not counting those who work for pittances in rigged economies.

The problem is that some blacks were enslaved – by other blacks – and then marketed by Muslim slave-traders, who were notorious – and taken to work in the Americas. That was tragic, but hardly uncommon.

Enter the Democrats

What is interesting is that the US political party which most supported slavery was called the Democrats. We can discuss how this group developed and how they evolved from British political parties later, but for now, it's enough to note that they were the majority party of the rural elite – and since the rural poor either did not have a vote or were themselves slaves, they had a pretty free run.

The Democratic Party, as it's now known, is currently making a big thing about open borders into the USA. Why is that? We know from surveys that once people from Latin America settle and become established in the USA, their voting patterns change – they become Republicans. So why are the Democrats to obsessed with this, such that they allowed over two million illegal immigrants to enter the country last year?

The reason is that the Democrats have never lost their slave-owner mentality. Immigrants can be used as the perfect substitute for slaves; poorly paid and largely uneducated, they are a natural underclass, the modern serfs, if not technically slaves. Sure, their children might be different, but that first generation is all the Democrat needs, to stuff his ballot boxes and pick his fruit.

Plus ca change, plus ca reste pareil.

Punishing ordinary Russians for the actions of the Russian State

The West, or rather the Western dictators all too keen to divert attention from their crimes, has now committed yet another one. It is literally stealing the property of Russian citizens as punishment for what the Russian State is doing in Ukraine.

Whether or not the action is Ukraine is justifiable or even forgivable, this does not make the dispossession of ordinary Russians acceptable. This tendency, to use the power of the State against individuals is the hallmark both of the dictator and the failed State. The dictators of the New World Order have taken this to heart and are running with it.

Do not be fooled by them. They punished you, for nothing, with no justifiable cause, for two years – indeed still are – over an imaginary pandemic that turned out to be a bad cold. And they want you to forget the evil and harm they did, by doing the same thing to some other innocent civilians and hoping you'll be onside.

Well, don't be. We need to be rid of these dictators, the governments they lead and the state bureaucracies that enable them. The whole lot needs to be extirpated, root and branch.

Don't forget, once they've crucified the Russians, it will be someone else's turn. Vietnamese, Serbs, Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, have all felt the appalling cruelty of the West, just in the last half century; Russia's crimes are as nothing in comparison.

When they've destroyed the Russians, nailed them to metaphorical poles all over the world, crashed their economy and ruined them, who will they turn on next? Will it be you again, under the pretext of a new, utterly bogus 'global emergency'? It might not be a fake pandemic or the worn out tropes of greenism and 'net zero', it might be something else and if all else fails, they always have the back-up of nuclear war. You don't think they'd sacrifice you and yours in order to keep power? How naïve. What's a few hundred million casualties to the New World Order?

But wait a bit: the Russians have Putin and he has the air of a man not to mess with. Can you be sure you too will not need his protection against your own state bureaucracies? Or if not Putin, someone like him? A man with the balls to stand up to the globalist NWO? Well, you know...

Rod Fleming's World